About
Take On Payments, a blog sponsored by the Retail Payments Risk Forum of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, is intended to foster dialogue on emerging risks in retail payment systems and enhance collaborative efforts to improve risk detection and mitigation. We encourage your active participation in Take on Payments and look forward to collaborating with you.
What's New
Federal Reserve Web Sites
Other Bank Regulatory Sites
Take On Payments
« Warning! This Vehicle Has Been Immobilized | Main | Same-Day ACH: An NFAQ »
March 7, 2016
Card Chargebacks: Sorting Out the Facts
For years, I have heard conflicting statements by card issuers and acquiring merchants about the impact of chargebacks on their businesses. A chargeback is a demand by a card issuer for a merchant to make the issuer whole for the loss of a disputed transaction by a cardholder. Because of consumer liability protections afforded under various regulations and the card brand's liability rules, the issuer or the merchant typically incurs the final loss. The issuer initiates a chargeback when a cardholder disputes a transaction on the statement—for one of a variety of reasons—if the issuer believes the merchant is financially liable under the particular card network's operating rules. Merchants may accept the chargeback and assume the loss, or they may dispute it if they believe they were in compliance with the network rules.
The debate over the amount of chargeback losses to merchants has continued over the years because of a lack of independent research, but all that has changed with a study published in January by my colleagues at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Senior economists Fumiko Hayashi and Rick Sullivan along with risk specialist Zach Markiewicz examined chargeback and sales data from October 2013 through September 2014 from selected merchant acquirers who process more than 20 percent of network-branded card transactions in the United States. While the study examines the full chargeback landscape of four-party networks (Visa and MasterCard) and three-party networks (American Express and Discover), the focus of this post is on their findings related to card fraud—both card present (CP) and card not present (CNP)—for the four-party networks. PIN debit transaction chargebacks were not included in this study.
Some of the study's key findings are:
- Overall, merchants incur 70–80 percent of all chargeback losses.
- Fraud is the most common chargeback reason and accounts for approximately 50 percent of total chargebacks in value.
- The average value of a fraud chargeback was $200, compared to $56 for the average sales transaction. Clearly, the criminals are going after higher-dollar value goods.
- The merchant loss rate in the CNP channel of 14.17 basis points (bps) is significantly higher than the 1.02 bps loss rate for the CP channel.
- As the chart shows, the merchant categories incurring the highest fraud rates were the travel and department store categories. Grocery stores had the lowest.
As previous posts have noted, the Federal Reserve is making a concerted effort to collect fraud data for non-cash payment channels to develop a holistic view and understanding of fraud trends. The Kansas City Fed is looking to repeat its study in the near future, when it will also include PIN debit transaction chargebacks. As our payments system evolves and user payment preferences change, it is vital for payments system stakeholders to be able to determine how these changes are affecting fraud losses being sustained by the various stakeholders.
By David Lott, a payments risk expert in the Retail Payments Risk Forum at the Atlanta Fed
March 7, 2016 in card networks , cards , consumer protection | Permalink
Comments
Google Search
Recent Posts
- Making the Choice to Use Cash
- We Are Thankful For...
- Will Payments Be Getting REAL?
- Financial Solutions for the Younger Generation
- Encouraging Password Hygiene
- Should We Throw in the Towel When It Comes to Data Breach Prevention?
- Looking for Partners in Safer Payments
- The Range of Un-Friendly Fraud
- Payments Webinar October 10: Cash in the 21st Century
- "Insuring" Ransomware Will Continue to Flourish
Archives
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
Categories
- account takeovers
- ACH
- ATM fraud
- authentication
- bank supervision
- banking regulations
- banks and banking
- biometrics
- card networks
- cards
- check fraud
- checks
- chip-and-pin
- collaboration
- consumer fraud
- consumer protection
- contactless
- credit cards
- crime
- cross-border wires
- currency
- cybercrime
- cybersecurity
- data security
- debit cards
- debt
- emerging payments
- EMV
- financial services
- financial technology
- fintech
- fraud
- identity theft
- innovation
- interchange
- KYC
- law enforcement
- malware
- mobile banking
- mobile money transfer
- mobile network operator (MNO)
- mobile payments
- money laundering
- money services business (MSB)
- online banking fraud
- online retail
- P2P
- Payment Services Directive
- payments
- payments fraud
- payments innovation
- payments risk
- payments study
- payments systems
- phone fraud
- prepaid
- privacy
- PSD2
- regulations
- regulators
- remittances
- remotely created checks
- risk
- risk management
- Section 1073
- skills gap
- social networks
- telecom
- theft
- third-party service provider
- transmitters
- trusted service manager
- Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices (UDAP)
- wire transfer fraud
- workforce development
- workplace fraud